so I should run one subject per 4 cores by using "-openmp 4" for each of the two subjects being re-conned simultaneously?
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi Joseph > > if you have lots to get through you might be better off running two with 4 > cores at a time. Speed increase is pretty good through 4 last time Nick > tested, but then the benefits fall off a bit > Bruce > > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, joseph veliz wrote: > > > What is the best set up to utilize the multicore capability of > freesurfer? > > > > Should we open a seperate terminal for each subject and run 3 > simultaneous recons with the > > -openmp 8, on each recon command line? > > > > Or is there a more efficient way of utilizing 8 cores and 16 gb of > memory? > > > > thanks so much > > > > joseph > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it > is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in > error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. > >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
