Hi Caspar
we tried to replicate this and couldn't. Can you upload the subject(s)
involved in this and send us the exact command line that shows the
problem?
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Caspar M. Schwiedrzik <cschwie...@rockefeller.edu>
Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015
Subject: problem with mri_label2label - large amount of holes
To: "Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Hi!
We are doing some analyses in which we map custom labels from one anatomy to
another, within subjects. As a control, we also tried to map anatomically
defined
V1s according to the method by Hinds within subject from one anatomy to another.
However, as you can see in the attachment, there are very many holes in the
labels after using mri_label2label. This does not happen with smaller labels.
Why
is this happening and is there a solution?
Thanks, Caspar
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
