Dear Anastasia and Freesurfer team,

I used TRACULA to get FA values for two groups: patients and controls.
After that, I ran between group comparison and got circa >0.05 p-values for
FA _Avg_Weight values BUT circa 0.001-0.005 p-values for FA_Avg_Center for
the same tract.

Then I ran correlation analysis and found out that some clinical scores of
patients correlate with FA_Avg_Weight values (p-value of c. 0.02) and with
FA _Avg_Center values (but with p-values of c. 0.002). So the correlation
with FA _Avg_Center is more significant than correlation with FA_Avg_Weight.

Once again, when I use FA_Avg_Weight in between-group comparison I got
non-significant results (slightly >0.05 p-value), but when I use
FA_Avg_Center in such comparison I got significant group difference (c.
0.001-0.005 p-values).

My question is – can I use these results and say that there is a
statistically significant difference in FA values in some tracts? Of
course, I will mention that these difference is significant when we compare
average FA values of the highest-probability path only and does not reach
statistical significance if we compare average values over the entire tract
weighted by the value of the probability distribution at every tract’s
voxel. As I understand, theoretically and logically, comparison of average
FA values of the highest-probability path only (instead of comparing
FA_Avg_Weight values) has more statistical power to detect more subtle
differences between groups. And in my case comparison of FA_Avg_Weight
values just has not enough statistical power to detect such subtle
difference. Am I right?

I will very appreciate and will be happy to hear any of your thoughts
concerning written above and especially any thoughts on how to interpret
such difference between results using FA _Avg_Weight and FA_Avg_Center
values.

Thank you in advance.

Kind regards,
Alexander Tomyshev

Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Multimodal Analysis,
Mental Health Research Center of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences,
34 Kashirskoe shosse, 115522 Moscow, Russia
Email.: alexander.tomys...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to