On 10/4/14 12:35 AM, Leise Borg wrote:
> So - just to be sure - if I take labels 2, 7, 41, and 46 from aseg.mgz, then 
> I have ALL white matter in the entire brain?
You should also add 251-255
251 CC_Posterior                            0   0   64  0
252 CC_Mid_Posterior                        0   0   112 0
253 CC_Central                              0   0   160 0
254 CC_Mid_Anterior                         0   0   208 0
255 CC_Anterior                             0   0   255 0

>
> And another question: I also need the white matter hypointensities. Until 
> now, I used label 77 of aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz. Is that sufficient? Or should 
> I use the aseg.mgz file for this too?
That is sufficient
>
> -Leise
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas N Greve [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
> Sent: 3. oktober 2014 18:55
> To: Leise Borg; Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] White matter and white matter lesions
>
>
> Those are the only WM labels present in the aseg. You may or may not want to 
> include brain stem as WM.
>
>
> On 10/03/2014 04:03 AM, Leise Borg wrote:
>> Hi again
>>
>> Labels 7 and 46 in the aseg-file gives me the cerebellum white matter
>> - which I can see from the aseg.stat-file. From the list at
>> http://www.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Slicer3:Freesurfer_labels I
>> can see that I also need the labels 2 and 41. It looks ok to me when I
>> plot it, but can I be sure that it gives me all white matter (NOT
>> white matter hypointensities)? I can see that there are several other
>> labels referring to white matter, such as label 219, 223, 3000 etc. Do
>> those labels point at subsets of the labels 2 and 41 (and 7 and 46)?
>>
>> -Leise
>>
>> *From:*Leise Borg
>> *Sent:* 3. oktober 2014 08:48
>> *To:* 'gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'
>> *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] White matter and white matter lesions
>>
>> Hi Douglas
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your answer. I will definitely do that. Can you tell
>> me how I load this aseg.stats file into Matlab? I do not have
>> FreeSurfer downloaded on my own computer. Do I need that to load this
>> file?
>>
>> -Leise.
>>
>> Why not just use the values in aseg.stats?
>>
>> On 10/01/2014 07:44 AM, Leise Borg wrote:
>>
>>> Hi FreeSurfer
>>> I am working on a project concerning Alzheimer's patients and I need
>>> to know the positions of white matter (WM) and white matter lesions
>>> (WML) from your segmentations.
>>> To find the WML, I use label 77 in the aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz-files.
>>> To find the WM, I use labels 2 and 41 in the ribbon.mgz-files and
>>> subtract the ventricles by subtracting labels: 4, 5 14, 15, 43 44
>>> found in the aseg.mgz-files.
>>> However, in the two sets of positions - one for WML and one for WM
>>> -there is an overlap. It is not big, but it is there.
>>> Can you help me finding the true WML- and WM-segmentations?
>>> With kind regards, Leise.

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to