Hi Ye
one is surface-based and the other is voxel-based. It's impossible to
tell which is correct from just a single slice. If you upload the entire
subject directory to our ftp server and give us the voxel coords of that
point we will take a look
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, ye tian wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,
My first attempt of this message somehow didn't make it to the mailing
archive. In case it didn't go through, I am sending it again. Sorry to
bother you if you received the first message.
Two things I was wondering
1) Why do the surfaces shown in the left and right panels disagree? (The
right one has a lot more white matter).
2) Do I need to edit the white matter? It seems unreasonable to have
+8mm thick of grey matter. If so, I will probably paint more voxels to
wm.mgz.
Thank you very much!
Sincerely,
Ye
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:33 PM, ye tian <tianye...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear freesurfers,
I would like a second eye on my decision to edit wm.mgz. I think that
the boundary between the gray and the white is unrealistic (e.g.
Coronal.png). Furthermore, there is a discrepancy between -surfs and
-surfs -aseg (e.g. attached coronal_aseg.png).
If I indeed need to edit these slices, which way is more preferable,
adding voxels or control points?
Thank you very much!
Sincerely,
Ye
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
