Hi Cesar, you cannot really do the analysis you want to do, it is 
mathematically impossible. If you do not expect a response from one of 
the conditions, then you could code it as 0. Alternatively, you can 
consider both conditions as a single 20 sec event and get the FIR for 
that event out to 28 sec. If you don't have to have an FIR analysis, you 
can assume a shape to the HRF and do the usual statistics on it.
doug
On 03/05/2013 01:21 PM, Cesar Echavarria wrote:
> Does the post-stimulus period have to be as long as 12 seconds? With 
> such a long time window I get the following error when running 
> selxavg3-sess:
>
> XCond = 1.47995e+18 (normalized)
> ERROR: design is ill-conditioned
>
> To clarify: in our design we have 10 seconds of condition 1 followed 
> immediately after with 10 seconds of condition 2 followed by 10 
> seconds of fixation.
> Given, this what would be the limit on how much post-stimulus time we 
> should include in our time window?
>
> Thanks again,
> Cesar
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Douglas N Greve 
> <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>     If you presented the stimulus for 10sec, then you should set the
>     time window to include about 12 sec after stimulus offset. If your
>     stimulus is 10 secand you want the time window to start 4 sec
>     prior to onset and go 12 sec after onset, then you will need a
>     time window of 4+10+12=26sec, so it would be --fir 4 22. You have
>     to model the return to baseline even if you are not interested
>     init. Try that and get back to me if it does not work.
>     doug
>
>
>     On 03/05/2013 12:43 PM, Cesar Echavarria wrote:
>
>         Hi Doug,
>
>         As you can see from the attached image (time course on x-axis,
>         normalized BOLD response on y-axis) the signal peak occurs
>         earlier than expected if I were to consider the first frame to
>         be -4 sec relative to stimulus onset.
>          In our experiment we presented a stimulus for 10 seconds, and
>         we wanted to see the time course of the BOLD response while
>         the stimulus was on. We also wanted to see the response of the
>         aftereffect due to the stimulus separately which is why we are
>         interested only in the 10 seconds the stimulus is on.
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Cesar
>
>
>         On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Douglas N Greve
>         <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>         <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>         <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>> wrote:
>
>             Hi Cesar, for your case, it would correspond to 4sec prior to
>             stimulus onset (the TR that goes from -4 to -3 sec). What
>         seems to
>             be wrong? The last frame would be the TR that goes from
>         +9sec to
>             +10 sec. Not related to your question, but Is 10 sec post
>         stimulus
>             long enough?
>             doug
>
>
>
>             On 03/05/2013 11:53 AM, Cesar E Echavarria wrote:
>
>
>                 Hi Freesurfers,
>
>                 I did an FIR analysis to get the BOLD response over
>         time, the
>                 following way
>
>                 mkanalysis-sess -analysis Afterimage_FIR2.rh -surface
>         self rh
>                 -native
>                 -fwhm 5 -paradigm ShapeAE_New.par -event-related
>         -polyfit 1
>                 -mcextreg -TR
>                 1.000 -nconditions 8 -force -fsd bold  -fir 4 14
>
>                 I then generated the relevant contrasts, ran the
>                 funcroi-config command,
>                 and the func-roi-table-sess command to create 14 files
>         for my
>                 ROI, each
>                 containing the signal value at 14 different time points.
>
>                 i.e.
>                 funcroi-table-sess -sf sessid -roi Labels/rh.V1 -c
>         condition1
>                 -map cespct
>                 -o ROI/frame0 -frame 0
>
>                 funcroi-table-sess -sf sessid -roi Labels/rh.V1 -c
>         condition1
>                 -map cespct
>                 -o ROI/frame1 -frame 1
>
>                 .
>                 .
>                 .
>                 funcroi-table-sess -sf sessid -roi Labels/rh.V1 -c
>         condition1
>                 -map cespct
>                 -o ROI/frame13 -frame 13
>
>
>
>                 My question is this:
>
>                 To what time point (relative to stimulus onset) does
>         the value
>                 in the
>                 frame0 file correspond?
>
>                 As I understand it, the first 4 frame values should
>         correspond
>                 to activity
>                 pre-stimulus. However, this expectation is not
>         corroborated by
>                 the timing
>                 and pattern of the BOLD response I am observing.
>
>                 I would appreciate any guidance on this issue.
>
>                 Thanks,
>
>                 Cesar Echavarria
>
>
>
>             --     Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>             MGH-NMR Center
>         gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>         <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>         <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>             Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>
>         <tel:617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>>
>             Fax: 617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422> <tel:617-726-7422
>         <tel:617-726-7422>>
>
>             Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>         <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
>             <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
>             FileDrop:
>         www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>         <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
>             <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
>
>             Outgoing:
>         ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
>
>
>
>
>             The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
>         person to
>             whom it is
>             addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
>         error and
>             the e-mail
>             contains patient information, please contact the Partners
>             Compliance HelpLine at
>         http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to
>             you in error
>             but does not contain patient information, please contact the
>             sender and properly
>             dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
>
>         -- 
>         Cesar Echavarria
>         Brain & Cognitive Science
>         MIT 2012
>
>
>     -- 
>     Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>     MGH-NMR Center
>     gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>
>     Fax: 617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422>
>
>     Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>     <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
>     FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>     <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
>     Outgoing:
>     ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Cesar Echavarria
> Brain & Cognitive Science
> MIT 2012

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to