Thanks Bruce. FYI, I got a couple of other emails off list. One of them reminded me that the original ADNI protocol had this resolution. Cheers, Souheil
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi Souheil > > our standard acquisition used to be 1.33x1x1 so I don't think there > should be any problem (although it has been a long time since we used to > get those - 1.5T and single channel) > > cheers > Bruce > On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Inati, Souheil > (NIH/NIMH) [E] wrote: > >> A colleague has some mprage scans collected on a 3T sagittally 1mmx1mm in >> plane, 1.3mm thick. The SNR and CNR are pretty good. I figured I'd ping >> the list to see if anyone have any experience running scans with the >> slightly thickish voxels through the recon-all pipeline. Anything I ought >> to look out for in particular? >> >> Thanks, >> Souheil >> >> ---------------- >> Souheil Inati, PhD >> Staff Scientist, Functional MRI Facility >> NIMH/NIH/DHHS >> souheil.in...@nih.gov >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine > at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in > error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
