Hi Souheil our standard acquisition used to be 1.33x1x1 so I don't think there should be any problem (although it has been a long time since we used to get those - 1.5T and single channel)
cheers Bruce On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Inati, Souheil (NIH/NIMH) [E] wrote: > A colleague has some mprage scans collected on a 3T sagittally 1mmx1mm in > plane, 1.3mm thick. The SNR and CNR are pretty good. I figured I'd ping the > list to see if anyone have any experience running scans with the slightly > thickish voxels through the recon-all pipeline. Anything I ought to look out > for in particular? > > Thanks, > Souheil > > ---------------- > Souheil Inati, PhD > Staff Scientist, Functional MRI Facility > NIMH/NIH/DHHS > souheil.in...@nih.gov > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
