Dear Doug,
thanks for the quick response. Sorry that I missed the post.
I downloaded the mac intel leopard dev from the nightly built and ran 
make_face_parcellation.
Running it with ic5 produced 10236 unique values (instead of 10242), running it 
with ic3 641 (instead of 642)
 
Is it possible that this is not the latest version? The BuildTimeStamp is: Jun 
24 2012 06:10:12, you uploaded the 
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/mris_make_face_parcellation.linux
 version on 16.07.12.

                ProgramName: mris_make_face_parcellation  ProgramArguments: 
--all-info  ProgramVersion: $Name:  $  TimeStamp: 2012/10/26-11:34:24-GMT  
BuildTimeStamp: Jun 24 2012 06:10:12  CVS: $Id: mris_make_face_parcellation.c,v 
1.18 2012/06/07 17:52:09 greve Exp $ ... Platform: Darwin  PlatformVersion: 
10.8.0  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 40000 


Thanks for your help,
Franz


Am 25.10.2012 um 18:29 schrieb Douglas N Greve:

> Hi Franz, this was noted and addressed a few weeks ago. You can download 
> a new version here:
> ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/mris_make_face_parcellation.linux
> doug
> 
> On 10/25/2012 10:33 AM, Franz Liem wrote:
>> Dear Freesurfers,
>> 
>> I have performed make_face_parcellation on fsaverage (with ic5) 
>> (Darwin-leopard-i686-stable-pub-v5.1.0). I read_annotation ed the 
>> parcellation into matlab an noticed that while colortable.table has 
>> 10242 rows (as expected), length(unique(colortable.table(:,5))) 
>> produces 9834 => some entries are in the list more than once. If I 
>> grasped the procedure correctly, the entries in label are determined 
>> by colortable.table(:,5) and  colortable.table(:,5)  is determined by:
>> %                       Column 5 is the structure ID, calculated from
>> %                       R + G*2^8 + B*2^16 + flag*2^24
>> 
>> One example for this problem is  colortable.table(43,:) 
>> and  colortable.table(86,:) both read:
>>           0           0         170           0    11141120
>> 
>> How are Rm G, B determined?
>> I guess one quick fix would be to introduce flags >0. Would that 
>> affect anything else? Or, is there a way to force my own indices 
>> onto colortable.table(:,5)? (if I change this entry, save the annot 
>> and load the annot, the entry is atR + G*2^8 + B*2^16 + flag*2^24again
>> 
>> (I already encountered the effects of this problem a couple of months 
>> ago (2. in this post 
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg21189.html).)
>> 
>> Thank you so much for your help,
>> Franz
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> -- 
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
> Fax: 617-726-7422
> 
> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> 


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to