Hi Martin,
 Each subject has 3-6 timepoints. They are all about one year apart.
Here's an example of the discrepancy: one subject with  5 timepoints had
volumes that ranged from 2.2-2.4. However, from the long_mris_slopes
command, the temporal average volume was calculated to be 1.67. Thanks for
your help!

-Shannon K.

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Martin Reuter
<mreu...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote:

> Hi Shannon,
>
> long_mris_slopes works for surface maps (both thickness and volume
> should work). In both cases it should compute the temporal average.
>
> I have another scripts that works for stats files (long_stats_slopes) in
> the same way.
>
> How many time points do you have, how far apart (equally spaced?).
>
> Best, Martin
>
> On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 14:59 -1000, Shannon Kogachi wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >    When I used the long_mris_slopes  command for the thickness, the
> > average thickness calculated in FreeSurfer was pretty similar to
> > averaging the values in FreeSurfer. Does this command only work
> > thickness measures and not for volume or area? Thanks!
> >
> > -Shannon
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Martin Reuter
> > <mreu...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >         Hi Shannon
> >
> >         You probably mean average thickness.
> >         My scripts compute the temporal average from the linear fit
> >         (at mid time), which can be differed from simply averaging
> >         values.
> >         Best Martin
> >
> >         Shannon Kogachi <skoga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >                 Hi,
> >                  I had a question about how the temporal average is
> >                 calculated for subjects with multiple timepoints. I
> >                 used the long_mris_slopes command on a longitudinal
> >                 set of data. However, when I compared the average
> >                 volumes calculated through this command to the average
> >                 volumes calculated in excel after extracting the same
> >                 vertices at the individual timepoints, these values
> >                 did not match up. The average volumes calculated
> >                 through long_mris_slopes were smaller. Please let me
> >                 know if there is a way to explain this discrepancy.
> >                 Thank you!
> >
> >                 -Shannon K.
> >
> >
> >
> >                 ______________________________________________________
> >
> >                 Freesurfer mailing list
> >                 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >
> >
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >         --
> >         Sent from my phone, please excuse brevity.
> >         The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
> >         to whom it is
> >         addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
> >         and the e-mail
> >         contains patient information, please contact the Partners
> >         Compliance HelpLine at
> >         http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
> >         sent to you in error
> >         but does not contain patient information, please contact the
> >         sender and properly
> >         dispose of the e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to