Hi Gari sorry, I'm a bit confused. Are you using the individual subject estimates of 44 and 45 generated by FreeSurfer, or mapping them from MNI space? In either case you can get overlap unless you pick the most probably label at each point.
cheers Bruce On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Garikoitz Lerma Usabiaga wrote: > Hi freesurfers experts, > this is (please check attached image) the best I got when trying to map a > volume ROI (BA45 in MarsBar = MNI_Frontal_Inf_Tri_L_roi) to freesurfer using > mri_vol2surf. > I used /freesurfer/average/mni152.register.dat instead of spmregister since > the ROI was already in mni152 2mm, the registration was perfect -checked with > tkregister2. > > - I obtained the red area of the image, which is outside of the ROI45.label. > Considering that the source was not exactly the same, could I consider it > acceptable for cortical thickness analysis? > - Why are the 44 and 45 overlapping? > > Thank you very much and sorry for the multiple questions, > Gari > > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
