Hi Linda

sorry, I've never tried this so I'm not sure. It will certainly vary across 
subjects though

Bruce

On Mon, 21 May 2012, Linda 
Douw wrote:

> Hi Bruce,
> Thanks for the suggestion. I've tried mris_make_face_parcellation, but I
> would still prefer the parcellation being based on the original.
> I'm now trying to use mris_divide_parcellation in multiple steps (to try
> and circumvent the constraint of dividing only by the longest diameter),
> where I first divide aparc into a new parcellation, and then proceed
> dividing the new parcellation into smaller ROIs. However, this method
> yields very strange results, as some ROIs are and some are not divided
> according to textfile I've created. Do you have any idea why this is, and
> how to solve it?
> Thanks,
> Linda
>
> On Thu, April 19, 2012 11:08 am, Bruce Fischl wrote:
>> Hi Linda
>>
>> I think that's one too many constraints. Do you need it to be based on the
>> original parcellattion? If not and a uniform parcellation will do you can
>> use mris_make_face_parcellation.
>>
>> cheers
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Linda Douw wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I would like to make a fine-grained surface parcellation from aparc -
>>> let's say 500 labels, and I would like the labels to be more or less
>>> isometric. When subdividing the parcellation with
>>> mris_divide_parcellation, the labels become very stretched instead of
>>> isometric. Is there a way to get a different result?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to