Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the suggestion. I've tried mris_make_face_parcellation, but I
would still prefer the parcellation being based on the original.
I'm now trying to use mris_divide_parcellation in multiple steps (to try
and circumvent the constraint of dividing only by the longest diameter),
where I first divide aparc into a new parcellation, and then proceed
dividing the new parcellation into smaller ROIs. However, this method
yields very strange results, as some ROIs are and some are not divided
according to textfile I've created. Do you have any idea why this is, and
how to solve it?
Thanks,
Linda

On Thu, April 19, 2012 11:08 am, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Linda
>
> I think that's one too many constraints. Do you need it to be based on the
> original parcellattion? If not and a uniform parcellation will do you can
> use mris_make_face_parcellation.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Linda Douw wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to make a fine-grained surface parcellation from aparc -
>> let's say 500 labels, and I would like the labels to be more or less
>> isometric. When subdividing the parcellation with
>> mris_divide_parcellation, the labels become very stretched instead of
>> isometric. Is there a way to get a different result?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Linda Douw, Ph.D.

Research fellow

Department of Radiology
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
Massachusetts General Hospital
Harvard Medical School
149 13th Street
Charlestown, MA 02129

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to