I only created a diff2anat.flt.mat file which replaced the old one. Do they
all need to be recreated? If so, is that something I add to the command
line?

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Anastasia Yendiki <
ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

>
> Were the old .mat files replaced with the new ones?
>
>
> On Fri, 18 May 2012, Kiely Madhavan wrote:
>
>  That seemed to fix the registration issue, but I'm still unable to
>> reconstruct the tracts using trac-all -path. I'm getting the same error
>> that
>> the control points are not within the mask. THis happens for all tracts.
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kiely
>>
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Anastasia Yendiki
>> <ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>
>>      The .mat registration matrix should be saved under dmri/xfms/.
>>
>>
>>      On Wed, 16 May 2012, Kiely Donnelly wrote:
>>
>>            I tried using corratio and it seems to have fixed
>>            the registration issue.
>>            I'm very new to this so just want to make sure I did
>>            it correctly before I
>>            move forward. Should the command line look something
>>            like this if I am
>>            running it in this individuals dmri directory:
>>
>>            flirt -in dwi_orig.nii.gz -ref brain_anat.nii.gz
>>            -out
>>            lowb_brain_anat.flt.nii.gz -omat diff2anat.flt.mat
>>            -cost corratio
>>
>>
>>            Thanks so much for your help.
>>
>>            Kiely
>>
>>            On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Priti Srinivasan
>>            <rspr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>                 you have to run flirt commandline separately to
>>            check if it
>>                 solves your
>>                 problem.
>>
>>
>>                 > Is this something I can change in my dmrirc
>>            file or do I need
>>                 to run flirt
>>                 > on it's own?
>>                 >
>>                 > Thanks,
>>                 >
>>                 > Kiely
>>                 >
>>                 > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Priti
>>            Srinivasan <
>>                 > rspr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>                 >
>>                 >> Kiely, For flirt, try using corratio, cost
>>            function instead
>>                 of
>>                 >> mutualinfo
>>                 >> (which is the default in trac-all) to see if
>>            that solves your
>>                 >> registration
>>                 >> problem.
>>                 >>
>>                 >>
>>                 >> > Hi Kiely - Looks like you used flirt for
>>            the intra-subject
>>                 >> registration,
>>                 >> > so you can look in trac-all.log for the
>>            flirt command line
>>                 that
>>                 >> registers
>>                 >> > diffusion to anatomical and play around
>>            with the
>>                 parameters.
>>                 >> >
>>                 >> > You can also use bbregister instead of
>>            flirt for the
>>                 intra-subject
>>                 >> > registration - it has the option to
>>            initialize with flirt
>>                 or with SPM.
>>                 >> >
>>                 >> > Hope this helps,
>>                 >> > a.y
>>                 >> >
>>                 >> > On Wed, 16 May 2012, Kiely Donnelly wrote:
>>                 >> >
>>                 >> >> Hi Priti - Thanks for your help. The
>>            inter-subject
>>                 registration seems
>>                 >> to
>>                 >> >> have run OK, but there must be something
>>            wrong with the
>>                 intra-subject
>>                 >> >> registration. When I try to view it using
>>            freeview, it's
>>                 completely
>>                 >> dark
>>                 >> >> - I
>>                 >> >> don't see a brain at all. Is there a way
>>            to troubleshoot
>>                 this?
>>                 >> >> Thanks,
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >> Kiely
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Priti
>>            Srinivasan
>>                 >> >> <rspr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>                 >> >>       Hi Kiely,
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>       Have you checked your inter and
>>            intra subject
>>                 registrations?
>>                 >> The
>>                 >> >>       control
>>                 >> >>       points going off the dwi is not
>>            only for one paths
>>                 but for all
>>                 >> >>       the paths.
>>                 >> >>       If the registration goes terribly
>>            wrong, this can
>>                 happen. You
>>                 >> >>       can take a
>>                 >> >>       look at
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>       /dmri/lowb_brain_anat.flt.nii.**gz
>>            (For intra subject
>>                 >> registration
>>                 >> >>       diff-anat)
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>       and
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>       /dmri/brain_anat_mni.nii.gz (For
>>            inter-subject
>>                 registration
>>                 >> >>       anat-mni)
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>       I would start by checking that
>>            first.
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>       Priti
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>       > Hello--
>>                 >> >>       >
>>                 >> >>       > I have run Tracula successfully
>>            for ~75 healthy
>>                 subjects.
>>                 >> >>       However, the
>>                 >> >>       > pathway reconstruction seems to
>>            fail for a handful
>>                 of people.
>>                 >> >>       I've
>>                 >> >>       > attached
>>                 >> >>       > the log file for one of these
>>            subjects. It appears
>>                 that the
>>                 >> >>       control points
>>                 >> >>       > are not within the dwi. A similar
>>            problem occurred
>>                 in a
>>                 >> >>       subject with
>>                 >> >>       > substantial signal loss in the
>>            dwi, but that
>>                 doesn't seem to
>>                 >> >>       be the case
>>                 >> >>       > for this particular person. I
>>            have been creating
>>                 the entire
>>                 >> >>       set of tracts,
>>                 >> >>       > but at this point, I'm only
>>            interested in the SLFt
>>                 and SLFp.
>>                 >> >>       >
>>                 >> >>       > Thanks,
>>                 >> >>       >
>>                 >> >>       > Kiely
>>                 >> >> >
>>            ______________________________**_________________
>>                 >> >> > Freesurfer mailing list
>>                 >> >> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>                 >> >> >
>>
>>             https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**
>> freesurfer <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >> The information in this e-mail is
>>            intended only for the
>>                 person to
>>                 >> whom
>>                 >> >> it is
>>                 >> >> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was
>>            sent to you in
>>                 error and
>>                 >> the
>>                 >> >> e-mail
>>                 >> >> contains patient information, please
>>            contact the Partners
>>                 Compliance
>>                 >> >> HelpLine at
>>                 >> >> 
>> http://www.partners.org/**complianceline<http://www.partners.org/complianceline>.
>>            If the e-mail was
>>                 sent to
>>                 >> you
>>                 >> >> in error
>>                 >> >> but does not contain patient information,
>>            please contact
>>                 the sender
>>                 >> >> and properly
>>                 >> >> dispose of the e-mail.
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >> >> --
>>                 >> >> Kiely M. Donnelly, M.A.
>>                 >> >> Doctoral Candidate, Clinical
>>            Neuropsychology
>>                 >> >> University of Cincinnati
>>                 >> >>
>>                 >>
>>            >>____________________________**___________________
>>                 >> > Freesurfer mailing list
>>                 >> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>                 >> >
>>
>>             https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**
>> freesurfer <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>                 >>
>>                 >>
>>                 >
>>                 >
>>                 > --
>>                 > Kiely M. Donnelly, M.A.
>>                 > Doctoral Candidate, Clinical Neuropsychology
>>                 > University of Cincinnati
>>                 >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>            --
>>            Kiely M. Donnelly, M.A.
>>            Doctoral Candidate, Clinical Neuropsychology
>>            University of Cincinnati
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kiely M. Donnelly, M.A.
>> Doctoral Candidate, Clinical Neuropsychology
>> University of Cincinnati
>>
>>


-- 
Kiely M. Donnelly, M.A.
Doctoral Candidate, Clinical Neuropsychology
University of Cincinnati
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to