Dear Freesurfers,

I have some questions regarding mris_make_face_parcellation (and possibly found 
one error in the .tri file).
(I am working with freesurfer-Darwin-leopard-i686-stable-pub-v5.1.0).

I would like to make a high res parcellation of several subjects and used 
ic3.tri. Parcels should correspond across subjects.
I computed mris_make_face_parcellation ../surf/lh.sphere 
$FREESURFER_HOME/lib/bem/ic3.tri ./lh.ic3.annot

1. It seems not to make a difference whether I choose  .sphere or .sphere.reg 
as input, the resulting parcellations are identical (i checked by comparing 
vertex label values in matlab; .inflated deviates a bit, but not substantially).
According to Bruce 
(http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg18509.html):
"You want to use either ?h.sphere if you want it to be uniform in subject space 
or ?h.sphere.reg if you want the parcels to correspond across subjects"

Could anybody tell me how the parcellation is performed exactly? I thought it 
was performed on the input surf (the input surf is parcellated into (e.g.) 642 
equally sized parcels), which should lead to different results at .sphere and 
.sphere.reg, shouldn't it? 

Alternatively, would it be better to mris_make_face_parcellation the fsaverage 
and mri_surf2surf the high res parcellation onto each subject to get 
cross-subject correspondency (I tried this. It didn't look that great with this 
command: mri_surf2surf   --srcsubject fsaverage  --sval-annot ic3.annot 
--trgsubject subject1 --tval ic3s03.annot --hemi lh )?

To recap, what is the best strategy to arrive with cross-subject-corresponing 
parcellations?  Performing mris_make_face_parcellation with ?h.sphere.reg for 
each subject individually?

2. There seems to be duplicate structNames/annotationValues when applying 
mris_make_face_parcellation with ic3.tri
In fsaverage at least the following labelnames are given to two spatially 
separated labels.
ic3.tri_vertex_25 (cluster 1 around vertex 41132, cluster 2 around vertex 
157199)
ic3.tri_vertex_42 (cluster 1 around vertex 137845, cluster 2 around vertex 
155417)
How come?


Thanks for you help,
Franz


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to