Hi Anthony - The labeling was done based on Wakana et al 2007. We did not include the IFOF exactly b/c of the controversy surrounding it.

a.y

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Anthony Dick wrote:

Hello all,

Is there any atlas to which these tracs are referenced? For cortical
anatomical boundaries there is broad consensus and a published referenced
atlas, which makes Freesurfer's automatic parcellation of cortical regions
an excellent tool. But there is not (as is often assumed) as broad a
consensus on white matter tracts (e.g., there is no middle longitudinal
fasciculus in the recent Oishi et al. white matter atlas and many would
argue it doesn't exist; the existence of separate inferior longitudinal
fasciculus and inferior occipitofrontal fasciculus is disputed; Catani's
arcuate fasciculus is based on one paper etc.). Is it such a good idea to go
automatically identifying white matter tracts without saying how they are
identified?  

Anthony

On 6/15/11 12:07 PM, Seán Froudist Walsh wrote:
      Hi Anastasia,

      Thanks for getting back to me and well done on making a very
      nice program. The first tracts I would like to have are the
      optic radiations, but there are others that would be nice to
      include: a three part arcuate fasiculus (a la Catani et al.,
      2005) rather than a 2 part one, Fornix, anterior commissure.

      If I were to manually do the dissections for the 33 subjects,
      what would be the most Tracula compatible way of doing it? I
      normally use TrackVis but I figure making all of the file
      conversions might be a nightmare. Which program was used in the
      original virtual dissections?

      Any further suggestions? Perhaps some of these tracts are
      included but I've missed them.

      Sean



      On 15 June 2011 08:37, Anastasia Yendiki
      <ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

            Hi Seán - Which tracts do you want to add? Our
            existing tracts have been labeled on 33 healthy
            subjects. It's certainly possible to include new
            tracts in the atlas but someone has to do the
            labeling on the same or a similar set of subjects.

            a.y

            On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Seán Froudist Walsh wrote:

                  Hi FreeSurfing Gurus,

                  I would like to add some new tracts to
                  the Tracula pipeline using my own
                  regions of interest. What would be the
                  best way to do this?

                  All the best and many thanks in advance,

                  Seán

                   




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners
Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the
sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mai
l
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLin
e at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in er
ror
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and prop
erly
dispose of the e-mail.



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to