Hi, thank you for the reply,
> what version are you running? The 32 and 64 bit versions will definitely > have differences - it's unavoidable. On Debian: CentOS 4 x86_64 stable v4.5.0 On Suse: CentOS 4 stable v4.5.0 are the screenshots within the expected range of random difference or do i have to assume that one of them must be wrong? and, would you recommend using either only the 32 bit version or only the 64 bit version for all of our processing? On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:26:36 -0500 (EST) Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > what version are you running? The 32 and 64 bit versions will definitely > have differences - it's unavoidable. In the newest version we did eliminate > some of the randomness that reduced reproducibility though. > > Bruce > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Andreas Berger > wrote: > > > Hi Freesurfers, > > > > we have FreeSurfer running on 10 computers: > > > > 7 computers with suse 10 32bit, freesurfer 4.5.0 32bit > > 3 computers with debian 5 64bit, freesurfer 4.5.0 64bit > > > > recon-all -all -i finished on all of them without any errors, so i assumed > > the best. > > out of curiousity i processed one of the subjects on both systems, and > > checking the results in tkmedit and tksurfer i noticed that they are > > visibly different. (thus in this case one of the surfaces does not look > > quite ok, other subjects processed on that system look fine however, i > > haven't looked through all of them yet). screenshots attached. also, i just > > started recon-all -all -s bert on both systems, so i can compare them to > > the original bert. > > > > what could be the reason for this failure at reproducibility? > > > > > > > > -- Andreas Berger <andreas.berger...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
