When specifying a FWHM, they may end up being a little bit different
because the distance between the vertices is more on the pial than on
the white, so you don't need as many iterations to get the same FWHM.
Having said that, the difference is pretty darn small between white and
pial.
doug
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi yczhang,
the smoothing only considers the topology of the surface, so smoothing
on the white and the pial are equivalent.
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Zhangyuanchao wrote:
I am still not quite clear about the averaging of curvature. Sorry
about that.
could you tell me exactly which function I should use, and How should
I choose each parameter?
First, I get the curvature value of the pial surface, I think I
should average the curvature value on the pial surface, perhaps not
on white surface, I read help, It seems that It is smoothed on the
white surface. How shoud I use the pial to smooth. And I want to keep
format of the output file same to the lh.pial.H.crv , and the only
difference is the scalar value is smoothed.
Second, I want to obtain the absolute value of the scalar, In this
step I will launch "mri_calc".
Third, I want to resample and smooth it using kernel fwhm 20mm.
Thanks!
yczhang
___________________________________________________________
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422
In order to help us help you, please follow the steps in:
surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
