Hi Graham -

First off, your observation that the FI seems correlated with area is 
completely correct. I'm not sure if you have the FS source code? Anyway, 
looking at the relevant code in 'mrisurf.c', the 

        MRIScomputeCurvatureIndices(...)

function pretty much computes the folding index (fi) as

        fi += area * Kmax * (Kmax - Kmin) ;

and then, once having summed over the surface, simply divides by 

        *pfi = fi / (4.0*M_PI) ;

In essence, this is Van Essen's Folding index -- although I personally do have 
some issues with it. First of all, Van Essen normalizes his measure with 
1/4/pi, indicating that the 1/4pi is the "integral for a cylinder the length 
of which equals its diameter). I seem to think this integral should be 
(1/2pi)^2, i.e. 1/4/pi^2. Either way, this is merely a fixed constant and 
doesn't change the behaviour.

And irrespective of the 1/4pi or not, the measure is a strict function 
of "size", or more accurately, the radius of curvature. Since the curvatures 
run as the inverse of radius, the curvature values in small sulci/gyri can 
dominate the 'Folding Index', even if they are 'folded' exactly the same as 
larger sulci/gyri. In fact, there is nothing really related to 'folding' per 
se in the measure, so it is arguably something of a misnomer - but I fear I 
am digressing.

I know Bruce originally wrote the FI into FS, but based on this quick 
re-analysis, I'm kind of thinking that we should normalize the fi (and ici 
for that matter) with the area overwhich each measure measure is computed...

        *pfi = fi / (4.0*M_PI) / areaCounted;

This makes potentially more sense and removes the area dependency. What do you 
think, Bruce? 
        
-=R

-- 
Rudolph Pienaar, M.Eng, D.Eng / email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
149 (2301) 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129 USA
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to