Alright I converted the COR files to mgz fine, and saved the volume as
brainmask.mgz.  All looks good.  But before I run -autorecon2, am I
going to run into problems because I only have a brainmask.mgz and not a
brainmask.auto.mgz?  (I deleted the old brainmask.auto.mgz because it
was the old volumes before I corrected them manually).  I just want to
make sure I am good to run -autorecon2 before I go ahead and begin it.

Quoting Bruce Fischl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> but you'll need to convert the COR file you saved to brainmask.mgz if
> you 
> want to recover your edits (4 hours of manual editing!).
> 
> Bruce
> 
> On Wed, 28 Jun 
> 2006, Nick Schmansky wrote:
> 
> > The brainmask.mgz file is the one that should be edited (and
> saved), so
> > select that filename to save.  Then just continue with autorecon2
> (and
> > it will use your brainmask.mgz).  It will not overwrite your
> > brainmask.mgz unless you specify the aptly named '-clean-bm' flag
> to
> > recon-all.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I just finished my 4 hour manual editing...went to file>save
> volume
> >> as...then saved it to where it defaulted me, which was the mri
> folder of
> >> this subject.  When i pull up my brainmask, it is giving me the
> same one
> >> that it had before i made any changes.  I hope i didnt do
> something
> >> wrong and lost all the edits.  There is 256 COR files though now
> in my
> >> mri folder for this subject I noticed.  Maybe these are the
> edited
> >> slices?  Just let me know how to get my final brainmask and how
> to
> >> proceed with running -autorecon2 on it properly.  Thanks.
> >>
> >> Quoting Bruce Fischl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >>> it helps detect cases in which the deformation is too big (e.g.
> when
> >>> the
> >>> surface deforms all the way into the cerebellum), and can thus
> >>> recover from
> >>> e.g. cerebellum chopping.
> >>>
> >>> On
> >>> Wed, 28 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I am currently in the process of manual editing...just curious
> >>> though,
> >>>> what exatly does adding an atlas do to the skullstrip process?
> >>>>
> >>>> Quoting Nick Schmansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> First have a look at the troubleshooting wiki pages at:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/TroubleshootingData
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In particular, Subject 1 has a skull strip problem, and the
> fix
> >>> info
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/SkullStripFix
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm guessing you have seen this page since you have already
> >>>>> attempted
> >>>>> one type of fix (adjusting the watershed parameters).  The
> >>>>> alternative
> >>>>> fix is the slice-by-slice manual editing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You could also try adding the wsatlas flag:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   recon-all -s (subject) -skullstrip -wsatlas
> >>>>>
> >>>>> which will use an atlas to help with the skull-strip.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Does the contrast of your image look good?  That is, comparing
> >>> your
> >>>>> orig.mgz to that of the sample subject 'bert' included with
> >>>>> freesurfer?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nick
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>>>> I am having trouble with one of my skull strips, and getting
> >>> very
> >>>>>> extreme results.  When I re-run the skullstrip using
> different
> >>>>> watershed
> >>>>>> values, anything at 56% or below takes 75%+ of the brain out,
> >>> and
> >>>>> as
> >>>>>> soon as I jump to 57% or higher, it leaves on almost all of
> the
> >>>>> skull,
> >>>>>> except for maybe 5% of it.  Is this indicative of a more
> >>>>> complicated
> >>>>>> problem, and what is my next step (other than manually taking
> >>> off
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>> skull), if any?
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
> >>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Freesurfer mailing list
> >>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Freesurfer mailing list
> >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to