you need to fill the wm with 255 so we know it's an edit.
Bruce
On Fri, 14 Oct
2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
Hi,
When editing the wm, is it better to fill sections (eg., when thickening
temporal lobe strands) using a brush with intensity at 255, or 110?
I've noticed that if I fill using 110 and run autorecon2-cp with -keepwmedits
the fill is basically ignored when the wm is re-segmented. Just wandering why
255 would be better than 110?
Thanks,
Alex
Alex Fornito
M.Psych/PhD (clin. neuro.) candidate
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre and Department of Psychology
The University of Melbourne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer