And would placing control points in the filled part work? Or maybe at the base of the strand, before the filled part? Also, It seems that if I run autorecon2-cp after making pial edits to brain volume, the edits are ignored, and a new brain volume is generated, ie., my edits to the brain volume are no longer there. Does autorecon2-pial have to be run as a separate process, after autorecon2-cp? Thanks again, Alex Alex Fornito M.Psych/PhD (clin. neuro.) candidate Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre and Department of Psychology The University of Melbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________ From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 14/10/2005 9:13 PM To: Fornito, Alexander Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Surface edits you need to fill the wm with 255 so we know it's an edit. Bruce On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote: > Hi, > When editing the wm, is it better to fill sections (eg., when thickening > temporal lobe strands) using a brush with intensity at 255, or 110? > I've noticed that if I fill using 110 and run autorecon2-cp with -keepwmedits > the fill is basically ignored when the wm is re-segmented. Just wandering why > 255 would be better than 110? > Thanks, > Alex > > > > > Alex Fornito > M.Psych/PhD (clin. neuro.) candidate > Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre and Department of Psychology > The University of Melbourne > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
