So why didn't freedos keep dosfsck; it its better?.
cheers DS On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 22:48:22 +0100 Eric Auer <e.a...@jpberlin.de> writes: > > Hi Dale, > > FAT32 has too large metadata to be convenient > to handle for CHKDSK. Because of this, it is > only supported by DOSFSCK, which requires a > 386 or newer CPU and several MB of free RAM. > > It has been a while since DOSFSCK got ported > to DOS, but I think you will be fine with the > older version which FreeDOS is still using :-) > > Of course, if anybody feels like backporting > the newest DOSFSCK version (from the Linux > dosfstools) to DOS, I am happy to provide > a bit of advice and support. No time to do > the actual update myself any soon, sorry. > > Regards, Eric > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-user mailing list > Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user > ******************************************************>>>> >From Dale Sterner - MS organic chemistry http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo00975a052 *******************************************************>>>> ____________________________________________________________ Sad News For Meghan Markle And Prince Harry track.volutrk.com http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5ddafe353215a7e3418efst01duc _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
