Try these links
https://code.google.com/p/nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/downloads/detail?name=DILLODOS-302b.zip&can=2&q=
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/New-release-of-the-Dillo-web-browser-for-DOS-td19097.html
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Karen Lewellen <klewel...@shellworld.net>
wrote:
> Hi Don,
> no on that browser where Might I find it? I think I looked at the freedos
> edition and it did not suit compared to what my ssh telnet options
> present.
> Now if I could find a wireless d-link card sigh.
> I do not understand what web security has to do with Dos, or browsers that
> pose no threat.
> The very nature of a low graphic environment suggests disinterest on the
> part of those who create bugs that do graphical harm.
> I am too boring a user for them to care about my machine smiles.
> Thanks for the suggestion,
> Kare
>
>
> On Mon, 18 May 2015, Don Flowers wrote:
>
> > Karen, I also use the D-Link card (PCMCIA) in my home and it is an
> > outstanding card for DOS/FreeDOS, I get the desire to maintain a pure DOS
> > machine (I have one desktop and two laptops that are DOS only). Have you
> > tried DIllodos (the lasted build not the one in the FreeDOS repo)? Using
> > that, I can access the HTML GMAIL, I can verrry slowly browse ebay (but
> > cannot buy or watch an item), I can search for DOS stuff and download it
> to
> > my FreeDOS download folder. FreeDOS's internet limitations are not
> > necessarily on the FreeDOS end but rather on the end of the evolution of
> > web security.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Karen Lewellen <
> klewel...@shellworld.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> <lifts hand from back of class>
> >> But that is what I seem to be missing about freedos.
> >> I run DOS only, and have no interest in having 8 different operating
> >> systems on my main desktop to get the job done.
> >> I have a d-link Ethernet card. The card is very good with a ton of
> >> drivers, including the one I use for dos.
> >> I have a package called ssh2021b. this package contains ssh telnet and
> >> sftp programs as well as telnet ones for running in dos.
> >> I use the program for machines higher than 386 to ssh TELNET here
> >> shellworld, into the shell I have with the host for my office
> dreamhost.
> >> Granted, I am not using a browser directly on my computer, but this
> >> of mouse because I cannot. it is because no one has done a dos build of
> >> Lynx
> >> in a grand while. Equally elinks needs spider monkey to have the slight
> >> java and for some reason I cannot find a recent links for dos.
> >> Browsers not withstanding though, why is it so hard to just do this in
> >> freedos?
> >> took me ten minutes to do the setup i have for networking.
> >> I may hunt the wifi card below, if it is suitable for a laptop.
> >> Sorry if this seems innocent, but what is the challenge?
> >> Karen
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 18 May 2015, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> >>
> >>> About networking -- have you looked at the wiki article?
> >>>
> >>> http://www.freedos.org/wiki/index.php/Networking_FreeDOS
> >>>
> >>> It contains already quite a lot of informations, on many aspects of the
> >>> DOS networking world.
> >>>
> >>> Mateusz
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 18/05/2015 10:52, Don Flowers wrote:
> >>>> I have a HP Elite 8000 with 12gb RAM, I use XOSL to boot Kubuntu
> 14.04,
> >>>> Windows 7, Compaq DOS 5.0, MS-DOS 7.10 and FreeDOS. When running
> Compaq
> >>>> DOS and/or MS-DOS 7.10, I use the native HIMEM and Windows 3.1 runs
> fine
> >>>> in enhanced mode; on FreeDOS even standard mode seems buggy, so it is
> >>>> not necessarily a RAM issue but seems to be (IMHO) some kind of
> kernel
> >>>> incompatibility.
> >>>>
> >>>> As for Wi-Fi, I got it to work on a Compaq Armada 1750 using a Proxim
> >>>> (Orinoco Gold 802.11b PCMCIA card (using WPA), but when we switched
> to
> >>>> Xfinity service the WPA setup was not compatible with our other
> wireless
> >>>> devices.
> >>>>
> >>>> I personally would like to see an updated step-by-step how to on a
> wired
> >>>> home network setup for FreeDOS.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Rugxulo <rugx...@gmail.com
> >>>> <mailto:rugx...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Guillem <guilevi2...@gmail.com
> >>>> <mailto:guilevi2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I've been thinking of dualbooting my Windows PC with FreeDOS,
> >>>>
> >>>> Why exactly? Although it's not a totally horrible idea, it's very
> >>>> tedious and a bit technical. Not worth risking anything important.
> >> As
> >>>> I told one guy recently, make sure you backup all important files
> >>>> first, and even then, only if you have all your Windows DVD
> recovery
> >>>> discs (and product key) nearby.
> >>>>
> >>>> What Windows do you run? WinXP? Win7? With the former, do you run
> it
> >>>> atop pre-existing FAT or (incompatible) NTFS? I'm not even sure
> you
> >>>> can (properly) resize NTFS at all before Vista (without Linux
> >> GParted
> >>>> or whatever). Also, Vista on up upgraded the boot loader, so it's
> >> more
> >>>> complicated to adjust, hence probably needing third-party EasyBCD.
> >>>>
> >>>> Native is fun, fast, (sometimes) less buggy, and runs DOS as
> >>>> originally designed. But these days we also have great
> alternatives
> >>>> like DOSEMU or VirtualBox or QEMU. These emulations are much
> easier
> >> to
> >>>> use and less error-prone, albeit no one solution is 100% perfect
> >> (not
> >>>> even native). If your cpu supports VT-X, you'll probably benefit
> >>>> greatly from using that (e.g. VBox or KVM or similar) instead of
> raw
> >>>> booting, esp. for better accuracy and speed.
> >>>>
> >>>> The simplest solution (if your PC can boot from USB) is to use
> RUFUS
> >>>> to make a bootable jump drive. Heck, you could also use various
> >> tools
> >>>> to make a bootable Linux (presumably with DOSEMU). Even if you're
> >>>> using an old Pentium 4 (like my old one), you can still boot USB
> via
> >>>> PLoP Boot Manager via floppy (or CD or HD).
> >>>>
> >>>> > and the only things that are preventing me from doing that right
> >> now are the fact that USB serial controllers don't work all the way
> >>>>
> >>>> At best, you're probably just going to have the BIOS detect a USB
> >> jump
> >>>> drive as a fixed disk that can't be unplugged/removed (without
> >>>> rebooting). Bret Johnson did write some nice UHCI-only drivers,
> but
> >> a
> >>>> lot of machines don't support that, unfortunately.
> >>>>
> >>>> > and also that there's apparently no way to use applications that
> >> require a sound blaster reliably. Is there any way to make some kind of
> >> driver
> >>>> > that would sit between the application and the actual soundcard
> >> (in my case a realtek) and forward what the app is trying to send to the
> >>>> > soundblaster to the realtek the right way?
> >>>>
> >>>> Although it's not native and isn't even a real DOS (no actual
> >> FreeDOS
> >>>> being used), the (portable, SDL-based) DOSBox emulator supports a
> >> lot
> >>>> of graphics and soundcards, mostly for old commercial games. But
> >>>> you'll need a different host OS for it. (Linux? FreeBSD? Kolibri?)
> >>>> Believe it or not, this is better than even XP's NTVDM for many
> (but
> >>>> not all) games.
> >>>>
> >>>> > I'm talking from a user's point of view here. I have never tried
> >> developing anything for DOS so I really don't know about the
> limitations.
> >>>>
> >>>> In native DOS? Not sure, not many have tried. Most of us aren't
> >> savvy
> >>>> enough to do something so extremely technical. I mean, one guy did
> >>>> port SoftMPU (MPU-401 TSR emulator) to DOS, but even that is
> loosely
> >>>> based upon DOSBox! :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Like mentioned, there really needed to be a universal API for that
> >>>> (and some did exist), but it was never popular enough for many to
> >> care
> >>>> hard enough to utilize or fix it. So we have some libs, but
> nothing
> >>>> universally useful. Also, lots of old games are hard to find, but
> >> they
> >>>> sometimes do support multiple outputs, even PC speaker. Although
> >> even
> >>>> that isn't always physically available, but it's often better than
> >>>> nothing!
> >>>>
> >>>> > Also would FreeDOS actually run on a PC with 8gb of RAM? That's
> >> what this one has, but after the previous message in this topic I'm not
> so
> >> sure.
> >>>>
> >>>> I run it just fine on my 6 GB Lenovo desktop. Of course, due to
> >> memory
> >>>> holes, I "only" get (roughly) 2.9 GB free, but even that is "too
> >> much"
> >>>> for some rare software (chokes, dies). But most well-behaved apps
> >>>> (e.g. DJGPP) either work by default or can be massaged.
> >>>>
> >>>> Not sure how well it will work if you're running UEFI (CSM?).
> >>>>
> >>>> > I guess I would also have to figure out networking. I have no way
> >> of using Ethernet because of how this house is set up.
> >>>> > I can either use Wifi or use my phone with USB tethering, which is
> >> what I normally do because that PC's network card doesn't work all the
> way.
> >>>>
> >>>> This alone is probably the biggest advantage of emulators (e.g.
> VBox
> >>>> or QEMU, both of which I've used lately): easy to setup
> networking.
> >>>> You know by default that it will work, unlike native, where you
> >> can't
> >>>> be sure of anything!
> >>>>
> >>>> Granted, you mentioned Windows, but it's exactly Windows that
> >> doesn't
> >>>> support DOS well anymore (if at all). So while it seems crazy to
> >> use a
> >>>> software-only x86 emulator atop Windows on x86, sometimes it
> really
> >> is
> >>>> better than nothing.
> >>>>
> >>>> In short: it depends on what you're trying to do, and whether you
> >> can
> >>>> debug your own problems.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> One dashboard for servers and applications across
> Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> >>> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> >>> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable
> Insights
> >>> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> >>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Freedos-user mailing list
> >>> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> >> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> >> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> >> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Freedos-user mailing list
> >> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
> >>
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
