<lifts hand from back of class>
But that is what I seem to be missing about freedos.
I run DOS only, and have no interest in having 8 different operating 
systems on my main desktop to get the job done.
I have a d-link Ethernet card.  The card is very good with a ton of 
drivers, including the one I use for dos.
I have a package called ssh2021b.  this package contains ssh telnet and 
sftp  programs  as well as telnet ones for running in dos.
I use the program for machines higher than 386  to ssh TELNET here 
shellworld,  into the shell I have with the host for my office dreamhost.
Granted, I am not using a  browser directly on my computer,  but this 
of mouse because I cannot. it is because  no one has done a dos build of Lynx 
in a grand while.  Equally elinks needs spider monkey to have the slight 
java  and for some reason I cannot find a recent links for dos.
Browsers not withstanding though, why is it so hard to just do this in 
freedos?
took me ten minutes to do the setup i have for networking.
I may hunt the wifi card  below, if it is suitable for a laptop.
Sorry if this seems innocent, but what is the challenge?
Karen


On Mon, 18 May 2015, Mateusz Viste wrote:

> About networking -- have you looked at the wiki article?
>
> http://www.freedos.org/wiki/index.php/Networking_FreeDOS
>
> It contains already quite a lot of informations, on many aspects of the
> DOS networking world.
>
> Mateusz
>
>
>
>
> On 18/05/2015 10:52, Don Flowers wrote:
>> I have a HP Elite 8000 with 12gb RAM, I use XOSL to boot Kubuntu 14.04,
>> Windows 7, Compaq DOS 5.0, MS-DOS 7.10 and FreeDOS. When running Compaq
>> DOS and/or MS-DOS 7.10, I use the native HIMEM and Windows 3.1 runs fine
>> in enhanced mode; on FreeDOS even standard mode seems buggy, so it is
>> not necessarily a RAM issue but seems to be (IMHO) some kind of  kernel
>> incompatibility.
>>
>> As for Wi-Fi, I got it to work on a Compaq Armada 1750 using a Proxim
>> (Orinoco Gold 802.11b  PCMCIA card (using WPA), but when we switched to
>> Xfinity service the WPA setup was not compatible with our other wireless
>> devices.
>>
>> I personally would like to see an updated step-by-step how to on a wired
>> home network setup for FreeDOS.
>>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Rugxulo <rugx...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:rugx...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Guillem <guilevi2...@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:guilevi2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>    >
>>    > I've been thinking of dualbooting my Windows PC with FreeDOS,
>>
>>     Why exactly? Although it's not a totally horrible idea, it's very
>>     tedious and a bit technical. Not worth risking anything important. As
>>     I told one guy recently, make sure you backup all important files
>>     first, and even then, only if you have all your Windows DVD recovery
>>     discs (and product key) nearby.
>>
>>     What Windows do you run? WinXP? Win7? With the former, do you run it
>>     atop pre-existing FAT or (incompatible) NTFS? I'm not even sure you
>>     can (properly) resize NTFS at all before Vista (without Linux GParted
>>     or whatever). Also, Vista on up upgraded the boot loader, so it's more
>>     complicated to adjust, hence probably needing third-party EasyBCD.
>>
>>     Native is fun, fast, (sometimes) less buggy, and runs DOS as
>>     originally designed. But these days we also have great alternatives
>>     like DOSEMU or VirtualBox or QEMU. These emulations are much easier to
>>     use and less error-prone, albeit no one solution is 100% perfect (not
>>     even native). If your cpu supports VT-X, you'll probably benefit
>>     greatly from using that (e.g. VBox or KVM or similar) instead of raw
>>     booting, esp. for better accuracy and speed.
>>
>>     The simplest solution (if your PC can boot from USB) is to use RUFUS
>>     to make a bootable jump drive. Heck, you could also use various tools
>>     to make a bootable Linux (presumably with DOSEMU). Even if you're
>>     using an old Pentium 4 (like my old one), you can still boot USB via
>>     PLoP Boot Manager via floppy (or CD or HD).
>>
>>    > and the only things that are preventing me from doing that right now 
>> are the fact that USB serial controllers don't work all the way
>>
>>     At best, you're probably just going to have the BIOS detect a USB jump
>>     drive as a fixed disk that can't be unplugged/removed (without
>>     rebooting). Bret Johnson did write some nice UHCI-only drivers, but a
>>     lot of machines don't support that, unfortunately.
>>
>>    > and also that there's apparently no way to use applications that 
>> require a sound blaster reliably. Is there any way to make some kind of 
>> driver
>>    > that would sit between the application and the actual soundcard (in my 
>> case a realtek) and forward what the app is trying to send to the
>>    > soundblaster to the realtek the right way?
>>
>>     Although it's not native and isn't even a real DOS (no actual FreeDOS
>>     being used), the (portable, SDL-based) DOSBox emulator supports a lot
>>     of graphics and soundcards, mostly for old commercial games. But
>>     you'll need a different host OS for it. (Linux? FreeBSD? Kolibri?)
>>     Believe it or not, this is better than even XP's NTVDM for many (but
>>     not all) games.
>>
>>    > I'm talking from a user's point of view here. I have never tried 
>> developing anything for DOS so I really don't know about the limitations.
>>
>>     In native DOS? Not sure, not many have tried. Most of us aren't savvy
>>     enough to do something so extremely technical. I mean, one guy did
>>     port SoftMPU (MPU-401 TSR emulator) to DOS, but even that is loosely
>>     based upon DOSBox!   :-)
>>
>>     Like mentioned, there really needed to be a universal API for that
>>     (and some did exist), but it was never popular enough for many to care
>>     hard enough to utilize or fix it. So we have some libs, but nothing
>>     universally useful. Also, lots of old games are hard to find, but they
>>     sometimes do support multiple outputs, even PC speaker. Although even
>>     that isn't always physically available, but it's often better than
>>     nothing!
>>
>>    > Also would FreeDOS actually run on a PC with 8gb of RAM? That's what 
>> this one has, but after the previous message in this topic I'm not so sure.
>>
>>     I run it just fine on my 6 GB Lenovo desktop. Of course, due to memory
>>     holes, I "only" get (roughly) 2.9 GB free, but even that is "too much"
>>     for some rare software (chokes, dies). But most well-behaved apps
>>     (e.g. DJGPP) either work by default or can be massaged.
>>
>>     Not sure how well it will work if you're running UEFI (CSM?).
>>
>>    > I guess I would also have to figure out networking. I have no way of 
>> using Ethernet because of how this house is set up.
>>    > I can either use Wifi or use my phone with USB tethering, which is what 
>> I normally do because that PC's network card doesn't work all the way.
>>
>>     This alone is probably the biggest advantage of emulators (e.g. VBox
>>     or QEMU, both of which I've used lately): easy to setup networking.
>>     You know by default that it will work, unlike native, where you can't
>>     be sure of anything!
>>
>>     Granted, you mentioned Windows, but it's exactly Windows that doesn't
>>     support DOS well anymore (if at all). So while it seems crazy to use a
>>     software-only x86 emulator atop Windows on x86, sometimes it really is
>>     better than nothing.
>>
>>     In short: it depends on what you're trying to do, and whether you can
>>     debug your own problems.
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to