>>> ... With my own testing I found JEMMEX more compatible than XMGR >>> or HIMEMX + JEMM386 in various cases, but on other systems it is >>> different, as Mike mentioned ... >> >> To WHAT "incompatibilities" are you referring?? > > The A20 stuff that Syslinux/Isolinux (and MEMDISK) mess around with, > even before loading a DOS kernel. As your driver expects a sane > BIOS setting and sane behaviour of the DOS kernel, it's slightly > less tolerant/paranoid compared to JEMMEX. This is all at boot- > time (config.sys), not runtime (devload xmgr.sys) as no A20/HMA > stuff is involved then due to DOS (kernel-)limitations.
I would like to know exactly WHAT kind of "insane" settings re: "A20" can be done by Syslinux/Isolinux, which would in fact "confuse" XMGR! Send me a private E-Mail, and if XMGR can be modified so Syslinux and Isolinux do NOT "confuse" it, I will make such modifications in XMGR! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
