Alain, >> In creating JEMM386, Japheth did not merely improve things! He >> made FD-EMM386 RUN PROPERLY! > > Finaly you agree with me! Michael Devore's emm386 was tested very > very much by the members of FreeDOS and Michael fixed ALL issues.
I DO NOT agree with you, and HE DID NOT fix all issues! As far as I know, the many "bugfix" items I noted in my E-Mail to Eric REMAIN in FD-EMM386! They were fixed ONLY when Japheth did so within his own JEMM386, and FD-EMM386 itself remains NEVER-UPDATED!! > Michael started with something, I don't remember what. But he > grew so much disgusted with these fights that when the last issue > got fixed, he *disapeared* Read the FD-EMM386 source file, to see what he started with. You should more-correctly say "When the last issue HE KNEW ABOUT got fixed, he *disappeared*"! If that were not so, then like I noted to Eric, HOW do you explain all those "bugfix" items which Japheth had to address LATER??!! But, "Have it your way", Alain! If you wish to continue with a 5-year-old FD-EMM386 that has known BUGS and is NO-LONGER on the "Base Software" list for FreeDOS, then "You go right ahead!" and use FD-EMM386. As for me and quite a lot of others, I will use JEMM386, which I consider to be FAR superior and always WILL be! Jack R. Ellis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
