Jack, FD-EMM386 is very outdated, yes. But when it was still maintained, updates were often tested by a number of users. With JEMM, it is more like "here is an update, enjoy".
> I have reviewed Japheth's "Changelog", I believe much of what he > had to do changing FD-EMM386 to JEMM386 are "Flat-Ass DISASTERS" > and I shall continue to AVOID using FD-EMM386... Thanks for taking the time to read the changelog, can you give some examples of bad FD-EMM386 bugs which were fixed by JEMM? Of course there are zero JEMM bugs fixed by FD-EMM386, but that does not mean that JEMM is by definition free of bugs. I do believe Alain when he says that he did have data loss with the latter - which may not be due to bugs at all, maybe it is just that JEMM makes it easier for the users to shoot their own foot. Which is why I still think that FD-EMM386 also has some pretty nice sides. Even though I would NOT recommend to "upgrade" to a 5 year old FD-EMM386 for THAT reason. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Ciosco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
