Quoting Eugen Leitl (2013-07-15 18:54:33) > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 06:39:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > My question was rhetorical, and directed to Robert's strawman. > > > > My answer was blind to that strawman, targeted your posts, and > > addressed it as if your later post quoted above was related to your > > original question. > > Sorry, not parsing you here. FBX is P2P infrastructure, and as such > the only reason why FBX is not a good match for mobile alternative > Android distros is because there is no Android debian project.
Incorrect. FreedomBox is a federated server, not a P2P system. P2P is applications installed on user-facing devices, talking directly to similar applications on other user-facing devices. FreedomBox is a server - i.e. applications (services) talk to similar applications and to *other* applications (clients) installed on user-facing devices. Both FreedomBox and P2P are different from centralized servers, but in different ways: P2P puts all burden on the user-facing devices and requires redesigned protocols, whereas FreedomBox allows continued use of same client tools and protocols, just stretches federation to an extreme one-network-per-user structure. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
