On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:48:26PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Eugen, > > Quoting Eugen Leitl (2013-07-15 15:25:42) > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:29:12AM +0200, Robert Martinez wrote: > > > FreedomBox should be the server behind the services you use. Because > > > servers are where the main surveillance infrastructure lies. > > > > Why "should"? What precisely is a server in a P2P cloud? > > There are several ways to avoid centralized services. One is to host > services on decentralized servers, another is to avoid client-server > architecture altogether and use P2P architectures instead. Yet another > is to completely avoid always-on networking and instead use sneakernet. > > The approach used with FreedomBox is that of decentralized servers. > Extremely decentralized: One server per user. > > So in the context of FreedomBox your question does not make sense.
My question was rhetorical, and directed to Robert's strawman. _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
