> I'd said nearly a dozen times that the issues I have aren't > specifics. I am questioning the overall policy for EoL here. Even if > it was known to work properly on my hardware the overwhelming amount > of bugs in 6.3 indicates an unstable release.
No. 6.3 is very stable for us, on multiple machines. So is 7.0. And I have seen lots of other users basically saying the same thing. *You* are the one claiming that "the overwhelming amount of bugs in 6.3 indicates an unstable release" - yet you are unwilling to test 6.3 and you are also unwilling to show the PRs you claim exist. My sympathy for such a view is limited. Personally, I'm very happy with the work that the developers have put in and are *continuing* to put in. However, I'm just a user, not a developer. I have occasionally contributed bug fixes to FreeBSD, which is *my* best waying of returning the favor of all of the persons who have spent countless hours, often unpaid, to make FreeBSD a better system. I hope they continue! Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
