Hello, linux-firefox-2.0.0.1 works fine for me. Cheers, -vlado vlado.srv# uname -a FreeBSD srv.g1.netng.org 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Nov 3 20:20:33 CET 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usrmnt/src/sys/SRV i386 vlado.srv# ll /var/db/pkg/ | grep firefox drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 9 led 20:06 firefox-2.0.0.1,1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 8 led 08:18 linux-firefox-2.0.0.1 vlado.srv# ll /var/db/pkg/ | grep flash drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 7 led 13:21 libflash-0.4.13_1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 7 led 13:03 linux-flashplugin-7.0r69
Pete French píše v út 16. 01. 2007 v 22:07 +0000: > > If you had any idea how many RFC's IE violates and and how many bugs there > > are in it you would never have made a statement like that. > > I don't think here ever said that IE was *better*, just that it was > necessary for certain sites (which is undeniably true) and that if > all you have available is Firefox then you at least want to have a working > stable Firefox. > > It does seem to boil down the the flash issue though - for me native > Firefox is stable, until I try and add flash. So I live without flash, > but that measn there are a number of things I just can't do, as well as > the IE only sites (which are becomming rare). In the end I bundle any such > jobs > up and do them at home where I keep an x64-XP box for such things. If the > most stable flash enabled player on FreeBSD is linux-firefox 1.5 then it > would be nice to have it in ports. > > -pete. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
