On 14 September 2006, at 14:05, Björn König wrote:
hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) schrieb:
On 12 September 2006, at 02:06, Björn König wrote:
Karl Denninger schrieb:
This is not cool folks.
I think you misunderstood what -STABLE means. (Or maybe I do?)
-STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a
stable and working operating system.
Hahahahaha... That's ironic...
That wasn't meant to be ironic. Years of experience and
observations of development lead to this conclusion.
RIght. All i can say, though, is that someone that doesn't know any
better would probably not think "Oh! That means that upgrades are
possible between releases, and not that my system will actually run,
or anything!"
It just seems it'd be quite a cause of confusion.
Regards
Björn
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
hackmiester (Hunter Fuller)
<svinx> yknow when you go to a party, and everyones hooked up except
one guy and one girl
<svinx> and so they look at each other like.. do we have to?
<svinx> intel & nvidia must be lookin at each other like that right now
Phone
Voice: +1 251 589 6348
Fax: Call the voice number and ask.
Email
General chat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Large attachments: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPS-related stuff: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM
AIM: hackmiester1337
Skype: hackmiester31337
YIM: hackm1ester
Gtalk: hackmiester
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xfire: hackmiester
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
