On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:34:08PM -0500, hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote: > > On 14 September 2006, at 14:05, Bj?rn K?nig wrote: > > >hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) schrieb: > >>On 12 September 2006, at 02:06, Bj?rn K?nig wrote: > >>>Karl Denninger schrieb: > >>> > >>>>This is not cool folks. > >>> > >>> > >>>I think you misunderstood what -STABLE means. (Or maybe I do?) > >>> > >>>-STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a > >>>stable and working operating system. > >>Hahahahaha... That's ironic... > > > >That wasn't meant to be ironic. Years of experience and > >observations of development lead to this conclusion. > > RIght. All i can say, though, is that someone that doesn't know any > better would probably not think "Oh! That means that upgrades are > possible between releases, and not that my system will actually run, > or anything!" > It just seems it'd be quite a cause of confusion.
Anyone who is confused but doesn't attempt to enlighten themselves by reading the provided documentation deserves to stay confused :) Kris
pgpdu8UO4NIuT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
