On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 02:36:31PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:13:31PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 03:21:33PM +0000, Patrick J Okui wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Once the -RELEASE branch is taken, code updates there <STOP>. > > > > > > > > > > I take it you haven't read the text in the handbook that has been > > > linked to by a few posters. > > > > > > You can track changes to a particular release - say by using > > > RELENG_6_1 rather than RELENG_6. In which case, would you still > > > say you are tracking STABLE? > > > > Yes. > > > > If I track RELENG_6 (once 6.0-RELEASE has gone out) then I'm by definition > > tracking -STABLE. > > > > Indeed, the current tag on my CVS tree is TRELENG_6! > > Not the question he asked, please re-read. > > Kris
Yes it is, in the general case; in any event if you track RELENG_6_1 you will get no bug fixes in general - security related items to filter back down but in general bug reports posted against a -RELEASE are, if addressed, put into -STABLE. -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
