You can track changes to a particular release - say by using
RELENG_6_1 rather than RELENG_6. In which case, would you still
say you are tracking STABLE?
If I track RELENG_6 (once 6.0-RELEASE has gone out) then I'm by definition
tracking -STABLE.
Damn, I'm confused now. Let me try and get this straight:
CURRENT
This is, by definition, broken a good part of the time, and is
what it says, namely current, ie work in progress.
STABLE
This is broken some of the time and .. uh .. isn't really all that
stable, actually.
RELENG_n_m
This is completely stable and only tracks security fixes.
RELENG_n (RELENG_6 at the moment)
Has somebody just said that RELENG_6 = STABLE? I'm going to guess
then that RELENG_7 is CURRENT.
No, this doesn't make sense to me at all.
Indeed, the current tag on my CVS tree is TRELENG_6!
Eh? T?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
