On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:55:42AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> > >>This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was > >>that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed > >>stable ... > > > >You mean like in the FreeBSD handbook? It's not anyone else's fault > >if you haven't read the documentation. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html > > I swear, the last time I searched for a definition of STABLE vs > CURRENT/HEAD, that wsan't there ... but, granted, that was a very very > long time ago ...
Well, now you know. Might be a good idea to reread the handbook and other documentation to bring yourself up to date on anything else you might have missed too. Kris
pgpNQkqiGvM8J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
