On Tue, Февруари 8, 2005 14:33, Michael Nottebrock каза: > On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote: >> I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch. >> Beneath is one of them: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html >> >> Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not? > > You can now compile a kernel with options SCHED_ULE again. How well it > works > is for yourself to determine :-) (I've been using it on my UP machine here > since yesterday only).
Hi there I've been using only SCHED_ULE on my UP WS, even when there was #error def. It never broke, not even once :) Though I think there's trouble with SMP and/or HTT. I tried it once on a P4 and it paniced. On the other hand, using SCHED_ULE improves sound quality and general system 'response' concerning GUI... don't know 'bout performance. Regards _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
