On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:58:22PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:45:17 +0200 (EET) > "Viktor Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, ???????? 8, 2005 14:33, Michael Nottebrock ????: > > > On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote: > > >> I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch. > > >> Beneath is one of them: > > >> > > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html > > >> > > >> Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not? > > > > > > You can now compile a kernel with options SCHED_ULE again. How well it > > > works > > > is for yourself to determine :-) (I've been using it on my UP machine here > > > since yesterday only). > > > > Hi there > > > > I've been using only SCHED_ULE on my UP WS, even when there was #error > > def. It never broke, not even once :) Though I think there's trouble > > with SMP and/or HTT. I tried it once on a P4 and it paniced. > > > > On the other hand, using SCHED_ULE improves sound quality and general > > system 'response' concerning GUI... don't know 'bout performance. > > By any chance does it help with copying from ata disks on different > controllers ? For me on large files this brings up "swap_pager: > indefinite wait buffer" with 4BSD.
That doesn't sound like a scheduler problem, rather a hardware or ata driver problem. Did you try sos' new driver yet? Kris
pgpOLh0yQuUIM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
