Michael Nottebrock wrote:

On Tuesday, 30. November 2004 10:08, Michael Nottebrock wrote:

I shouldn't edit around in my replies so much. I meant to say:



Well, that's exactly the reason "why not freebsd". I didn't know research
labs these days choose the software they're working with based on what


the software could do instead of what it actually can do (right now).


But you are still thinking of software consumers and not of software producers.
We develop our own software and it also runs on FreeBSD... But it could run better if we had accelerated 3D drivers. Currently we have 2 options, mesa-gl and nvidia, but these options are not only for freebsd, they are the same we have for linux too.


-- paulo


_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to