On 19.02.2013 14:45, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it
wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after
kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers anyway.:-(
Should not a pre-C++11 compiler simply /fail/ upon encountering C++11 code?
>And if there is a*good* reason to reject the base compiler, I'd
>expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably with
>bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its toolchain or
>against the LibreOffice code. Or both...
I believe there were plenty PRs already.
I can not find any :-( The ones against FreeBSD
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=&severity=&priority=&class=&state=&sort=none&text=libreoffice&responsible=&multitext=&originator=&release=>
all talk about build failures (except the 176269
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/176269>, filed today). There
are no relevant bug-reports against LibreOffice, that mention "gcc-4.2.1"
<https://bugassistant.libreoffice.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=gcc-4.2.1> or "gcc
4.2.1 <https://bugassistant.libreoffice.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=gcc%204.2.1>".
-mi
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
