-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-19 14:31:02 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 19.02.2013 14:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> What do we go from here? I don't know. One thing I know for >> sure is we cannot support every possible build/runtime >> environment. >> >> Feel free to suggest your ideas and thoughts. > Well, support for "every possible" combination is, of course, a > toll order, but support for the base cc/c++ is a reasonable > expectation, in my opinion...
Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers anyway. :-( > And if there is a *good* reason to reject the base compiler, I'd > expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably with > bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its toolchain or > against the LibreOffice code. Or both... I believe there were plenty PRs already. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRI9ZdAAoJECXpabHZMqHOetMH+gMVJvAdp9x8jSzqvZQoaw28 fXoyNunlPTMq5U1sBzL1ZURm1nPwSutlAp5dccd4oRWQUXZ5uf09vNP8hI02cXz6 xteVQXtPEYYbkk6ySlpUfCl/Xostr1vkzT1a52KwGK8VHZsV41SXZEEylbBmTRfx ikoSpwQGBo8M6IpdrI29cfUWriajMSqXGYqNMFsloGj7kJVY/WKSe1OGraPtQMwR Y61255VJ83tpYo7a0HGSAKEOXCGLNg8cvXNG3F7bz/rP9eikbIvx8CYYWFPQ8IrO gB7l1Nz4XL0Z5J9jUi/QZ+dl/gM/OthaKH05WkTimmJJvlBfxphWkrELgJUwmPM= =hTpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
