On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 11:43 -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > FreeBSD is first and foremost a server OS.
Could you support your claim with some examples, please? > Desktop support is lacking when compared to the other major OSes > (Windows, Mac and Linux). Here too. How is "desktop support" on FreeBSD lacking? > You can make it > work, if you want to, but that's not what its primary function is. Where can I find some detailed information about what is FreeBSD's "primary funtion" and what does that even mean in the first place? > If you want a user friendly desktop OS, FreeBSD is probably not your best > choice. Why? How is KDE, Gnome, XFCE or some potential other desktop environment different from the literally exactly same one running on, say, Linux? m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
