On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 00:53:31 +0000, heasley wrote: > Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:15:10AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav: > > > i'm suggesting a port with a v1 client; that is built with all the other > > > binary ports for abi changes and whatever else is reasonable. yes, i > > > can build my own, but i feel it should be a port. > > > > You mean like net/tcpdump398, which was forked from net/tcpdump because > > some people liked its output format better than that of tcpdump 4, and > > then forgotten, and is known to have dozens of security vulnerabilities? > > I dont care what they do. They are consenting adults and could be told > that the port is EoS and may have holes. seems like a different animal > though; this isnt for fashion. I've transitioned everything that can be > to sshv2, what remains is stuck in time.
Nobody 'forbids' you from making such a port, for your own use and/or for others. See Peter Jeremy's suggestion re where it might be placed and what sort of dire warnings it ought to announce; I expect SO and ports secteam would insist on nothing less. This differs from expecting|demanding|hoping somebody ELSE should do it. Anyway, you've got lots of time until FreeBSD 10 is no longer supported. cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
