Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 01:24:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav: > heasley <h...@shrubbery.net> writes: > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> writes: > > > FreeBSD 10 supports SSHv1 and will continue to do so. FreeBSD 11 > > > and 12 do not, and neither does the openssh-portable port. I'm > > > afraid you will have to find some other SSH client. > > That is sad; > > You know what would be even sadder? If the OpenSSH developers had to > continue to devote significant resources to maintaining a rat's nest of > legacy code so 0.0001% of their users could continue to use an obsolete > protocol to connect to obsolete equipment, instead of devoting those > same resources to developing new features and improving existing ones. > Especially when those users have plenty of alternatives to choose from, > including but not limited to security/putty.
I was not suggesting that openssl maintain their apparently messy code; they're maintaining it already, for whatever the remaining period is. i'm suggesting a port with a v1 client; that is built with all the other binary ports for abi changes and whatever else is reasonable. yes, i can build my own, but i feel it should be a port. I appreciate the putty suggestion, but it appears to be graphical only. Happy to have it pointed-out that I've missed a port having v1. i also understand the devote position of buy new equipment to advance security; its simply not going to happen anytime soon. and i'm not alone. i'm not rich, i don't crontrol depreciation schedules, etc etc. _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
