On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Chad Perrin <per...@apotheon.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:07:28PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Glen Barber <glen.j.bar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 9/23/10 8:31 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: >> >>> >> >>> If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad, >> >>> lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and >> >>> vim-like (among other things ;-). >> >> >> >> Why is "written in C" considered such a great benefit by the Scrotwm >> >> developer(s)? Earlier today, I read this on the site: >> >> >> >> "On the other hand xmonad has great defaults, key bindings and >> >> xinerama support but is crippled by not being written in C." >> >> >> >> hahahahahahaha! >> >> >> What's up with that? How does Haskell "cripple" xmonad? >> >> >> >> In the end, you need not take yourself so seriously. The thread was >> generic enough to allow for some rhetorical flourish. I suggested >> something . . . pointed out that is written in C (as did the homepage) >> . . . AND you concluded some sort of insult; not my problem. >> >> Do you need a rim-shot for every joke? > > 1. Who said I took insult? You assume too much. > > 2. That was not a very clever joke, anyway. Where's the punchline? > > 3. That doesn't answer my question about the Scrotwm page. > > Even *I* am not so socially stunted as to think a comment like that on > the Scrotwm site would not raise some eyebrows. >
Some? sure. In the end, scrotwm is a simple wm that allows the "gui-apprehensive-type" folk a nice CLI in X. That's all I was suggesting. "Shave and a haircut" . . . Chad? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
