On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Glen Barber <glen.j.bar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/23/10 8:31 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: >>> >>> If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad, >>> lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and >>> vim-like (among other things ;-). >> >> Why is "written in C" considered such a great benefit by the Scrotwm >> developer(s)? Earlier today, I read this on the site: >> >> "On the other hand xmonad has great defaults, key bindings and >> xinerama support but is crippled by not being written in C." >>
hahahahahahaha! >> What's up with that? How does Haskell "cripple" xmonad? >> In the end, you need not take yourself so seriously. The thread was generic enough to allow for some rhetorical flourish. I suggested something . . . pointed out that is written in C (as did the homepage) . . . AND you concluded some sort of insult; not my problem. Do you need a rim-shot for every joke? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
