On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: > > If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad, > lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and > vim-like (among other things ;-).
Why is "written in C" considered such a great benefit by the Scrotwm
developer(s)? Earlier today, I read this on the site:
"On the other hand xmonad has great defaults, key bindings and
xinerama support but is crippled by not being written in C."
What's up with that? How does Haskell "cripple" xmonad?
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgpWhokOr90bo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
