Lars Eighner said the following on 2009-10-28 05:46:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:24:38 -0500 (CDT), Lars Eighner
<[email protected]> wrote:
Evidently by making it necessary to learn yet another scripting
language to configure it. Other than personal profit I cannot see why
people are clinging like grim death to something this fubar. Really,
let's go past this one more time:
"Sure, sendmail.cf is hard to work with so the solution is you learn
m4!"
Did you look at the link he offered? How helpful is that?
Beside which, m4 is a PORT. So if sendmail is not configurable
without a port, why isn't it a port?
Can we go back to our regular hacking, please? m4 is not a port:
$ which m4
/usr/bin/m4
Evidently my package database is corrupt in some way, because it shows
m4 as
an installed port. I wonder how that happened, how to fix it, and if it
will bite if I leave it alone.
%whereis m4
m4: /usr/bin/m4 /usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-1/man1/m4.1.gz /usr/src/usr.bin/m4
It's not a package.
If you want to fix it pkgdb -F
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
