On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:24:38 -0500 (CDT), Lars Eighner
<[email protected]> wrote:
Evidently by making it necessary to learn yet another scripting
language to configure it. Other than personal profit I cannot see why
people are clinging like grim death to something this fubar. Really,
let's go past this one more time:
"Sure, sendmail.cf is hard to work with so the solution is you learn m4!"
Did you look at the link he offered? How helpful is that?
Beside which, m4 is a PORT. So if sendmail is not configurable
without a port, why isn't it a port?
Can we go back to our regular hacking, please? m4 is not a port:
$ which m4
/usr/bin/m4
Evidently my package database is corrupt in some way, because it shows m4 as
an installed port. I wonder how that happened, how to fix it, and if it
will bite if I leave it alone.
--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
